When Responsibility Turns on Structure: What RCF IV Reveals About Power, Liability and Cost Control
The RCF IV case shows how unclear structures shift financial responsibility. In litigation, cost alignment prevents similar risks: clients fund one path, not both, and incentives are aligned so delay harms us, not them.
Sharpcan and the Purpose Problem in Litigation: Why Objectives Shape Outcomes and Costs
A High Court case on tax offers a quiet warning for civil litigants: purpose determines outcomes. If your goal is economic resolution, structural alignment — including two independent lawyers with one-path funding — prevents purpose drift and cost spiral.
When Tax Debts Become Insolvency Ammunition: Lessons from Broadbeach on Process, Power and Cost Risk
The Broadbeach decision shows how tax assessments can support statutory demands even while review is pending. This article explains the ruling and how one-path funding is built to stop clients paying for multiple litigation paths at once.