Consumer Guides on ‘No Win No Fee’
General information only — not legal advice.
Published: 15 August 2025 | Reviewed: 27 November 2025
(3-minute read)
Regulators warn: “No win, no fee” does not mean “no cost.”
We gather those warnings here — so you can see independent guidance, not anyone’s marketing.
1. What you may still pay
Expert reports
Filing fees
Opponent’s costs if you lose
Disbursements unless covered
2. Success fees
Many arrangements add an uplift (up to 25%) on top of normal costs.
3. Real case example
Todorovska v Brydens (2022):
Client won $100,000 → took home about $23,000.
4. Who controls the costs?
Usually the lawyer decides:
which experts to engage
when work is done
how scope expands
how costs accumulate
Regulators stress cost visibility is essential.
Official guides you can check directly
Where Clean Law fits (neutral + structural)
Clean Law does not offer no win no fee.
Our model works differently:
Escrow: your authority.
Two lanes: settlement vs trial — independent.
Aligned incentives: If YOU save, WE win; if your case DRAGS, we lose.
We help you see the risks in any model before you choose.
Explore more
→ Law Reform & Policy Commentary
Reference for this page and for more information:
Legal Profession Board of Tasmania - No Win No Fee Agreements
OLSC NSW – Fact Sheet 8: Costs Dispute Resolution (Nov 2022)
Legal Profession Board of Tasmania — No Win No Fee fact sheet
Victorian Legal Services Board + Commissioner — No Win No Fee costs
By Nicky Wang
Principal Solicitor
Legal Liaison Ltd (trading as Clean Law)
Prepared in accordance with public-interest governance,
annual Law Society trust-account audits, and ACNC-reported standards.
Disclaimer: This page is intended to provide general information only and is not legal advice. The contents may not reflect the most current legal developments and do not take into account your individual circumstances. You should not act or refrain from acting on the basis of this information without obtaining legal advice tailored to your situation.

