Law Reform & Policy Commentary
General information only - not legal advice.
Published: 15 August 2025 | Reviewed: 15 February 2026
(2-minute read)
Independent commentary on legal costs, disclosure, and structural safeguards in civil litigation.
This page summarises themes appearing in reform discussions, regulator guidance, and appellate decisions. It does not propose reform. It identifies recurring concerns in cost visibility and incentive alignment.
1. “No Win, No Fee” - Disclosure and Cost Visibility
Regulators across Australian jurisdictions emphasise that “no win, no fee” does not mean “no cost”.
Official guidance highlights:
potential liability for disbursements
uplift or success fees
exposure to adverse costs orders
the importance of written cost disclosure
Appellate decisions have also examined how fee structures operate in practice, including the proportion of damages ultimately retained by clients.
Reform commentary frequently centres on transparency, informed consent, and proportionality.
2. Escrow as a Structural Safeguard
Escrow mechanisms are widely used in finance and property transactions.
They are uncommon in litigation.
Reform discussions sometimes consider whether staged, approval-based funding structures could assist with:
reducing bill shock
improving scope clarity
managing timing of expenditure
preserving client control over cost progression
These discussions focus on structure, rather than personal conduct.
3. Independence and Governance
A recurring reform theme concerns the visibility of independence.
Topics commonly raised include:
avoidance of conflicted referral arrangements
clarity in fee relationships
separation of advisory and advocacy functions
external oversight and reporting
Structural safeguards, where adopted, are assessed by reference to transparency and regulatory compliance rather than assertion.
Independent Sources
Readers may wish to review the following independent publications:
Victorian Legal Services Board + Commissioner - Guidance on No Win No Fee cost agreements
Queensland Legal Services Commission - No win-no fee costs agreements: Information for consumers
Legal Profession Board of Tasmania - No Win No Fee Fact Sheet
NSW Court of Appeal - Todorovska v Brydens [2022]
Australian Government Productivity Commission - Access to Justice Arrangements (Public Inquiry)
These materials are publicly available and authored by independent bodies.
If YOU save, WE win;
if your case DRAGS, we lose.
Further Reading
→ Consumer Guides on ‘No Win No Fee’
Prepared by Clean Law (Legal Liaison Ltd)
Governed under ACNC reporting standards and subject to annual Law Society trust-account audit.
Disclaimer: General information only. Not legal advice.

