When Power Meets Purpose: The Fairness Test in Wayde v NSW Rugby League
When governing bodies or boards exercise broad discretionary power, the question quickly becomes: where is the line between legitimate strategy and unfair prejudice?
Wayde v NSW Rugby League shows how courts weigh fairness, discretion and the limits of oppression claims — lessons that matter for every modern leader facing conflict between individual interests and organisational purpose.
When Control Becomes Unfair: Lessons from Hillam v Ample Source
Hillam v Ample Source clarifies when courts will intervene in oppressive conduct and even wind up a solvent company. This short case note explains how “commercial unfairness” arises whenever one party holds disproportionate control — and why the same principle underpins Clean Law’s escrow safeguards, where client funds cannot move without their clear, informed approval.