Appeals, Evidence and Escalating Costs: What Fox v Percy Still Teaches About Litigation Risk
A leading case on appellate review, Fox v Percy shows how factual error can prolong disputes and increase cost. The judgment reveals why traditional models make clients fund both settlement work and trial or appeal preparation — and how Clean Law’s one-path structure avoids that duplication.
When Silence Speaks: The Jones v Dunkel Principle and the Hidden Cost of Uncertainty
A leading case on missing witnesses, Jones v Dunkel shows how uncertainty forces courts to rely on inference — and how that uncertainty can create dual-track legal costs. Clean Law’s one-path funding model is designed to prevent clients paying for both settlement and litigation simultaneously.
When Allegations Are Serious: Why the Briginshaw Principle Still Shapes Risk Today
A 1938 High Court case on adultery still shapes civil evidence law today. Briginshaw highlights how serious allegations create deep factual uncertainty — and how traditional legal models turn that uncertainty into dual-track costs. Clean Law’s one-path structure is built to contain that risk.