When Your Payment Depends on Someone Else’s Contract

A subcontractor completed his work but was told he had to wait for payment until the entire project reached occupancy — an event controlled by another contract. In Maxcon v Vadasz (2018), the High Court declared this dependency unlawful. The case highlights why payment fairness must be built on clear, contract-specific timing, not external milestones.

Read More
Australian Law, Employment Contracts, Fairness & Power, Client Protection Legal Liaison Ltd t/as Clean Law Australian Law, Employment Contracts, Fairness & Power, Client Protection Legal Liaison Ltd t/as Clean Law

When Losing Access to Your Own Email Decides Your Future

A long-serving executive was told redeployment was possible, then lost access to the very systems he needed to find a new role. In CBA v Barker (2014), the High Court confirmed there is no implied duty of mutual trust and confidence in Australian employment contracts. The case reveals how fairness must be built into process, not left to assumption.

Read More