Appeals, Evidence and Escalating Costs: What Fox v Percy Still Teaches About Litigation Risk
A leading case on appellate review, Fox v Percy shows how factual error can prolong disputes and increase cost. The judgment reveals why traditional models make clients fund both settlement work and trial or appeal preparation — and how Clean Law’s one-path structure avoids that duplication.
When Silence Speaks: The Jones v Dunkel Principle and the Hidden Cost of Uncertainty
A leading case on missing witnesses, Jones v Dunkel shows how uncertainty forces courts to rely on inference — and how that uncertainty can create dual-track legal costs. Clean Law’s one-path funding model is designed to prevent clients paying for both settlement and litigation simultaneously.