Home > How Your Case Is Managed
Two-Lawyer Representation
Two lawyers. One funded path at a time.
Designed to make cost, timing and responsibility clearer from the start.
Published: 25 September 2025 | Reviewed: 3 September 2026The Structural Question
In most litigation matters, the same firm may conduct both:
settlement discussions and mediation, and
preparation for trial, including pleadings and evidence.
There is no duplication of work in that structure.
However, settlement strategy and trial preparation sit within one billing relationship.
When both paths are prepared concurrently, timing and scope may become difficult for clients to see clearly.
Clean Law adopts a different structure.
Two Independent Lanes
Under the Clean Law model:
Lane 1: Clean Law
Settlement strategy, mediation, timing control, escrow oversight, and cost-safety analysis.
Lane 2: Courtroom Lawyer
Pleadings, evidence, contested hearings, and trial advocacy.
Clients begin in Lane 1 and fund Clean Law’s settlement, timing and escrow-oversight work first.
If litigation proceeds toward contested court work, the client appoints a separate courtroom lawyer under a separate costs agreement.
That courtroom lawyer’s costs are separate from Clean Law’s fixed fee. Their proposal may be staged, estimated or capped, depending on what they agree with you in writing.
This separation ensures that settlement work and trial preparation do not sit within one blended role.
Three Structural Protections
These protections arise from structure, not assurances.
1. Independent Early Case Analysis
Clean Law prepares a case analysis rather than a litigation brief.
This analysis:
identifies legal options
explains risks and timing
does not instruct counsel
does not initiate trial preparation
Because Clean Law does not conduct contested hearings, we do not benefit financially from recommending trial preparation.
2. Result-Based Alignment
Clean Law’s fixed fees apply to settlement and oversight work.
A results-based bonus is payable only when early settlement avoids identifiable trial costs.
No bonus is linked to damages recovered.
No contingency percentage applies.
If no trial costs are avoided, no bonus arises.
This structure links our remuneration to avoided trial expenditure, not to prolonging proceedings.
3. Escrow Authority
Funds are held in a regulated trust account with stage-based escrow controls.
Each stage:
has defined scope
has completion criteria
requires client approval before release of funds
No future stage is funded in advance unless you approve it in writing.
If the matter changes, such as through urgency, new evidence, amended pleadings, hearings or added complexity, later stages may need updated cost information before you decide whether to continue.
Escrow ensures:
work must match the agreed stage
unearned funds remain untouched
switching lawyers does not require duplicate payment
Escrow adds a client-controlled release gate alongside ordinary trust protections.
Related public guide: Why better litigation cost control needs structure, not just warnings
Being warned is not the same as being protected.
This short guide explains why real cost control needs decision points, separated roles, practical exits and early cost visibility before cost and procedure carry a matter forward.
Why Separation Matters
For separation to operate cleanly:
Clean Law must be capable of litigation
Clean Law must refrain from acting in contested hearings
This ensures:
settlement advice is not influenced by potential trial revenue
courtroom advocacy remains fully independent
oversight and advocacy never sit within the same role
Courtroom lawyers owe their paramount duty to the Court.
Clean Law’s role remains limited to settlement strategy, cost oversight, and escrow supervision.
The two roles remain distinct.
Clean Law does not control the courtroom lawyer’s forensic judgment, advocacy decisions or fees.
Our role is to help you understand timing, staging and cost consequences before you approve the next funded step.
Governance and Independence
The model operates within:
Safeguards include:
annual Law Society trust-account audits
ACNC governance and reporting
constitutional prohibition on referral fees
no panels
no profit sharing with courtroom firms
These mechanisms make independence structural rather than discretionary.
See:
In Summary
Two independent lawyers may reduce avoidable overlap where settlement and trial work would otherwise blur.
The aim is not to promise the lowest cost in every matter. It is to make each role, stage and funding decision visible before the next step is taken.
Separation clarifies timing.
Escrow clarifies authority.
Result-based alignment clarifies incentives.
The structure is designed so that:
If early settlement avoids trial costs, both client and Clean Law benefit.
If the matter escalates, Clean Law’s remuneration does not increase with delay.
Cost safety becomes structural.
Integrity follows from design.
By Nicky Wang
Principal Solicitor